Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sockley's model


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 08:55, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Sockley's model

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No apparent claim of Notability, no sources. Gbooks and Gscholar seem to give no related hits. (Although the last is hard to gauge due to lack of context.) TR 12:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 27 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of existence provided. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:51, 27 September 2011 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:45, 4 October 2011 (UTC)




 * Delete - there is no evidence of Notability, and no Verifiability. Google search finds nothing. Does not seem to have any basis in science (could be typo for Shockley, but he's well covered already). Chiswick Chap (talk) 04:31, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Strong delete; notability is clearly not established in the article and a Google search is not showing up with anything to prove it exists. 11coolguy12 (talk) 09:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Pictogram voting delete.svg Delete per nom. → Σ ⚑   ☭  07:09, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.