Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sod (insult)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 06:51, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Sod (insult)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NOTDIC: the article does not "go beyond what would be found in a dictionary entry (definition, pronunciation, etymology, use information, etc.), ", and it is hard to see how it could develop into an encyclopedic article. See Wiktionary, sod and sod off. Noyster (talk),  06:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: "Sod" -- "dirt" -- by extension, "go under the sod, die." (Sigh.) Well, that was fun. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Hithladaeus (talk) 12:06, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, wikipedia is not a dictionary.TheLongTone (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:04, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:04, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Just a dictionary definition.  Would be more applicable to something like Urban Dictionary or Wiktionary. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:16, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above. Tgeairn (talk) 17:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing wrong with the content but it belongs on Wiktionary, which already covers it, not Wikipedia. --DanielRigal (talk) 21:59, 7 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.