Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sody


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete as unsourced resume. Can be restored or userfied if sources are provided. ~ trialsanderrors 20:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Sody


This is not an encyclopaedic entry - it is a marketing page and therefore should be deleted. It adds no value to the Wikipedia community BookwormUK 00:18, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Neutral provide verification. Tulkolahten 13:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, but only just. WMMartin 16:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - just about notable and verifiable, but the page needs to be rewritten to be less of a plug. Pete Fenelon 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep only if rewritten. It's basically a spam article initiated by someone who has only contributed this article, obviously the publicist for the subject of the article.  However, the subject passes WP:BIO. -THB 20:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.