Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoftArtisans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:12, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

SoftArtisans

 * – ( View AfD View log )

non notable company, created by an SPA account creating a series of articles about this company and its non notable products Wuh  Wuz  Dat  06:28, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all (after adding an additional article from the same user). Fails WP:CORP; the only Ghits I can find are the company's website and free download sites. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:15, 9 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. I (barely...) declined a speedy on this but then bizarrely the original editor removed most of the claims to notability . In its current state, I would have had no hesitation in deleting. Kim Dent-Brown   (Talk)  07:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Cdulaney — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdulaney (talk • contribs) 17:05, 9 December 2010 (UTC)  — Cdulaney (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Sorry, I'm a novice wiki-er, and I've been trying to see what flies and what doesn't. I wasn't trying to turn the wiki page into a promo at all, but I do feel that owning to the originality of what OfficeWriter does--allow users to generate excel spreadsheets and word docs over the web, without having local copies of Office--the company, or at the very least OfficeWriter, should be listed. Perhaps it's best to just create a page about OfficeWriter? I've been getting more approved sources together, including a few programming books that discuss the software. What do you think? I really do want to stay within wiki's guidelines. Cdulaney — Cdulaney (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Don't delete I added in notable sources, removed (I hope) all promotional language, and added information.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.