Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoftStack Factory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 05:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

SoftStack Factory

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. (Never mind the question of what a "bootcamp" is supposed to be anyway in this context [apart from marketing buzzword glurge].)  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  00:32, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  00:32, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  00:32, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  00:32, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  00:32, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  00:32, 12 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - highly promo, which I suppose could be fixed, but why bother? Non notable organization, failing both NCORP and GNG. John from Idegon (talk) 19:35, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - They have no press coverage. The only thing that shows up on Google are social media profiles, reviews and directory listings. This article meets WP:G11 for a speedy deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonstephen0 (talk • contribs) 00:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - local business journals regularly write about new shops in town. That's why they're called.. ahem busienss journal. A local paper or newsletters don't satisfy significant coverage criterion of notability guidelines for organizations and companies Graywalls (talk) 05:01, 16 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.