Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Softasking


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deleted —Quarl (talk) 2006-03-22 19:36Z 

Softasking
Non-notable per WP:CORP. Looks like WP:SPAM as well. Their website doesn't seem to give off "company in existence since 1992" either. As a term, it gets 8 hits. Delete. Kinu t /c  07:54, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - as above. Wickethewok 07:55, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I forgot to mention it, but if you hadn't guessed, this is a contested PROD. -- Kinu t /c  07:56, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable -- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???  ???   ??? 07:57, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable corporation. —Quarl (talk) 2006-03-22 08:39Z 
 * Delete Non-notable company, WP:CORP refers. No claims to notability in article.   (aeropagitica)   10:47, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn company. --Ter e nce Ong 14:10, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * question:hi, dear editors, your comment about 'nn company' is absolutely true. my original thinking is to explain this term first created and used as a company name. i thought that wikipedia, as an encylopedia, will be interested in capturing any new term created and where it's used. that is the reason i've created the page. it is not my intention to create it as a company page. but since i'm a first time user, i'm not sure what is the policy regarding to the original intention i have. is it allowed to do this? if yes, do you have any suggestion about how to modify the page to make it to conform with your policy? if not, i appologized for this and i'll happily remove it immediately to conform with your policy. pls note that i'm not looking for debating on this but just seeking some guidelines and feedbacks. thanks for the help. best regards, --Softasking 15:48, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Answer - nope, thats not WP is for. What Wikipedia is not.. Wickethewok 17:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: thanks for the feedback. i understand now that wp is not for defining a new term. i'd like to remove this page ASAP. is there anyway we can do it? thanks. --Softasking 17:41, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The normal way is to write  at the top of the page you would like deleted.  Since you have requested deletion here (and the AFD will very likely continue in the current direction), I have gone ahead and deleted it. —Quarl (talk) 2006-03-22 19:35Z 


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.