Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Software manufacturing (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:41, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Software manufacturing
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not sure if this is a real practice. No sources, stub page, and most likely already covered by other pages. User known for self-advertising and copyright violations as well as possibly vote stuffing on the previous nomination. - Skynorth/ Starfrost my talk page 22:16, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:33, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete based on not only all of the above but also how the article reads more like an essay thanks to zero sources being provided.TH1980 (talk) 03:53, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, despite the amount of time that has passed since the original afd, the rationales for delete still stand true in my view. The "term" concerns me as sounding like something created or fabricated by the original author, or at least there may have been some conflict there. I did do a curious google search but it seems a bit hopeless as it's a broad combination of words, yet the article is very narrow. I can't see any development potential but even if there were, I don't think it would be progressing the current article but instead something different. Bungle (talk • contribs) 21:47, 6 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.