Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soggy biscuit

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep (no consensus) Dmcdevit·t 05:55, July 31, 2005 (UTC)

Soggy biscuit
It's wholly and vaguely speculative ("reputedly played", "reportedly been played". --Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 23:12, 14 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete (of course). --Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 23:20, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete I've heard of this, but we don't need articles on every random bit of folklore. Friday 23:31, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, while this isn't a good reason to make that my choice - even thinking about that game makes me feel extraordinarily unwell. However, I wouldn't delete it on the ground of it being hearsay, as many conspiracy theory pages exist on wikipedia too. I - amazingly - am not playing Tardis Tennis at the moment. 23:39, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unverified at this point. Dcarrano 01:23, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, google results indicate this is widely believed to be a real activity. Wikipedia is not censored. Kappa 01:36, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Mentioning censorship is a red herring; this seems at best to be an urban myth, and doesn't (on the evidence offered &mdash; i.e., none) deserve its own article. --Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 13:44, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Grosscruft. -- BD2412 talk 02:26, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 08:55, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * MErge into public schools in Britain Proto t c 14:22, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable teen prank, unencyclopedic. JamesBurns 03:58, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per Kappa. --Edcolins 10:31, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * MErge into Urban Legends
 * Above vote by anon, 212.117.85.241. --Blu Aardvark | (talk) 11:01, 17 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep, per Kappa. --Blu Aardvark | (talk) 11:01, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, even if it is rather disgusting it is a real activity. Sadly. James F. (talk) 15:51, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
 * What evidence is there for this? What citations can be offered?  --Mel Etitis  ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 22:02, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Ech, Keep per Kappa 66.167.144.200 02:15, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * This is the eleventh edit from this IP address; only three have not been to VfDs. --Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 22:02, 22 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep I came across a reference to it at http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/253287, and came here to research it. So I vote keep.
 * MSTCrow 04:10, July 24, 2005 (UTC)


 * But that reference is just as bad as ours, and offers no grounds for keeping the article. --Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 09:55, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Kappa. And even if it isn't true, it's of interest as folklore. --Yu Ninjie 03:45, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.