Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soil Quality Hypothesis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 07:01, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Soil Quality Hypothesis

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This term could apply to a variety of hypothesese related to soil quality. A search 1 does not reveal that the definition given here is more notable than any other. Indeed a more specific search yields no results at all 2 Pontificalibus  (talk) 22:37, 1 January 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a notable hypothesis as the nom describes, and if for some reason retained this should certainly be moved to something like Sokoloff-Engerman soil quality hypothesis.  However, to the extent this is of significance it is already adequately covered at Stanley Engerman.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 04:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, User:Glenfarclas is actually being generous, this hypothesis has no play or even mentions in reliable sources. Abductive  (reasoning) 04:44, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.