Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soju (drag queen)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to RuPaul's Drag Race (season 11). ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 10:51, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Soju (drag queen)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Qualified for deletion under G5, as being created by the blocked user user:Ratherbe2000. Was, in my opinion, incorrectly removed by another editor ignoring WP policy regarding sock article creation. This should be procedurely deleted so as to not encourage sock creation of articles.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:43, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep or just redirect to RuPaul's Drag Race (season 11). Unnecessary deletion nomination. The redirect serves a purpose and the page's history should be preserved for possible future expansion. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:45, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * comment for anyone. It also carries the risk of subsequent surreptitious resurrection of removed contents by those who holds direct or indirect vested interests through single purpose puppets long after the set of editors involved in the discussion have moved-on or no longer paying attention to the article. Graywalls (talk) 19:37, 30 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Redirect to RuPaul’s Drag Race. Outside of all that... practically none of these sources give independent notability and like 80% of them aren’t even reliable. Trillfendi (talk) 03:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:46, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:46, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:46, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:46, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:46, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 11:53, 27 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. GretLomborg (talk) 16:11, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * , If you're open to redirecting, would you note that here? I'm not sure there's much point in deleting the page altogether when the article's history may be helpful in the future and the redirect would serve a purpose by directing readers to the article for season 11? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:15, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete lacking WP:RS. Fails notability.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:24, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to RuPaul's Drag Race like with Plastique Tiara. QueerFilmNerd  talk 03:47, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete being in a reality show is not default grounds for notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:51, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Right, no one is suggesting she is notable just for being on a reality show. Can you at least comment on sourcing in some way since this is an AfD? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:55, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * delete and redirect to the season 11 since he was part of a show. Deleting it reduces the risk of surreptitious resurrection without triggering the new article creation scrutiny.Graywalls (talk) 20:17, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to RuPaul's Drag Race (season 11). Redirects serve a purpose, and this is a prime example of when we would use a redirect. People searching for the subject will be directed to the appropriate season where they can get more information. --Kbabej (talk) 23:07, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect a customary solution here, and is sufficient until the subject becomes notable enough that some non-spa ever wants to do an article.  DGG ( talk ) 05:05, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.