Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sol Zakay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Eddie and Sol Zakay. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Sol Zakay

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about one individual already covered by Eddie and Sol Zakay and doesn't substantially add anything as subject isn't really notable outside Topland Group, the company he runs with his brother Eddie. Had nominated for WP:A10 but was declined by a mysterious IP. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   15:49, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:35, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:35, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

The Sol Zakay page should be kept because he is a separate person from Eddie Zakay. There is additional information about Sol Zakay on the page - regarding his support of Arsenal and his interest in football as well as his charitable giving which is distinct from that of his brother. A different page could be created for Eddie Zakay and the page EDDIE AND SOL ZAKAY could be deleted. This could make more sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HBarker (talk • contribs) 11:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC) HBarker (talk) 11:39, 6 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect and hopefully it'll stay that way until a more solid separate article can be made as it simply seems he's best known as part of the group and the company. SwisterTwister   talk  04:52, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:10, 9 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect  to the pair, or make separate article for each and delete the combination article. There's no point having it both ways .  DGG ( talk ) 01:22, 21 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.