Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar Element Saga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:45, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Solar Element Saga
Non-notable book published by a vanity press (PublishAmerica). Only 120 Google hits, mostly booksellers. No significant Amazon sales. Benja 17:30, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Banja is absolutely right: this is a print-on-demand book, and although booksellers can stock it, I can't find any evidence that they do.  Sales figures unknown, but given the price, the unknown author and no stock on library / bookstore shelves, I'd say unlikely to be the magic 5,000. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 18:07, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete; regardless of the quality of this particular book, the publisher in general does not seem very selective . The google hits (57 hits for Blythe "Solar Element Saga") for a book written in English confirm that it is not notable enough for having an article about it written in an encyclopedia. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 18:11, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per norm. Swegner 18:57, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Google turns up nothing to indicate notability, and these user histories make it look like clear vanity editing to me. --William Pietri 19:12, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above... not a notable book. --W.marsh 20:26, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. *drew 04:51, 16 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.