Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar Energy World


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 18:39, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Solar Energy World

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is a train wreck and seems to be in dispute. That's not a reason to delete in itself, but I can't seem to find any neutral, non-PR sources that I could use to clean the article up. So I'm afraid deletion is the only answer. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  15:32, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:47, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:47, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. I noticed this at the same time Ritchie333 probably did, because an IP editor tripped edit filters when removing material from the article. In investigating that, I realized that not only was the removed material based on primary sources and blogs, but there is no independent significant coverage of the company, just PR and passing mentions. --RL0919 (talk) 15:59, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, excess PR. Hyperbolick (talk) 16:15, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: An article on a company going about its business. Announcements of office locations or completed installation tasks are routine coverage, nor are the awards and listings significant for WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 09:06, 27 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.