Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar Probe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Shanel 00:44, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Solar Probe
Is this for real? Facts&amp;moreFacts 23:01, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep- Has a source, thus the project is verifiable, but I'm a little concerned that it's not much more than a dicdef and a bit crystal-ballish. Can definitely be expanded though. I'll do it myself when I have a bit more time. Reyk 23:31, 9 March 2006 (UTC)


 * '''Keep". NASA thinks it is for real.  Thunk 23:47, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * '''Keep". Seems the project will develop. --Ton e 23:48, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I have added the official NASA project homepage to the article. It is hard to tell what stage the project has reached.  It is feasable that budget cuts could curtail the probe and make this article stillborn.  I think that it requires input from an expert in the field in order to produce a notable contribution.  There is little need to include project proposals that have failed to lift off from the drawing board, let alone the launch pad.   (aeropagitica)   23:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep A suitable encyclopedia topic. It will get expanded. Edgar181 00:21, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand - although I think someone got the wrong end of the stick. The probe will fly close to the Sun but not directly into the Sun. :) Green Giant 00:51, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's probably true. Facts&amp;moreFacts 04:07, 10 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep and Expand. StarTrek 04:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep encyclopedic. &mdash;-- That Guy, From That Show!  (talk) 2006-03-10 05:01Z 
 * Keep per above. SpaceHouse 21:28, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Georgewilliamherbert 00:42, 12 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.