Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar Sailor Holdings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 21:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Solar Sailor Holdings

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

This article seems to be about a non-notable company. Thus it appears more as promotion than anything elseCyrilleDunant 11:24, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:56, 18 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep The article claims that the company is notable, so I'll go with that. The author is an established editor, who doesn't seem likely to have a conflict of interest. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 12:09, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * comment - established editor still need to adhere to policy. -- Whpq 16:58, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. The claim is unsubstantiated, there are no sources, and the author seems to have a keen interest in renewable energies, which might lead him to get a bit carried away. Rama 14:14, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - A google news search shows that there are stories from the NY Times that appear to be about the company. Unable to review them as they are now pay to view.  But it appear that the article could be sourced to demonstrate notability. -- Whpq 16:58, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.