Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar eclipse of February 3, 1859


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 19th century. plausible search term, WP:ATD, content remains in the history undeleted so can be merged if anything is worth merging. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Solar eclipse of February 3, 1859

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails GNG: The eclipse only occurred in the sea near Antarctica, and it is unlikely that anyone saw the eclipse at that time. Likewise, history does not record this eclipse, and this eclipse has no scientific value. Therefore, this eclipse is not of notability, and therefore the references in the entry do not prove notability, i.e., they do not constitute a valid introduction. Q28 (talk) 01:04, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Astronomy,  and Antarctica. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 20:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as completely lacking coverage in reliable sources, as far as I can tell. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 14:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not an astronomical database; and as can be seen solar eclipses happen frequently. The only source for this is an all-inclusive catalogue, which is well short of the WP:GNG required. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 19th century. Praemonitus (talk) 00:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.