Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar eclipse of September 4, 2100


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. We have articles for eclipses almost up to 2200 (which is somewhat arbitrary, I suppose?) In any case, we should either delete all articles beyond a certain year or leave this one as it is (closing keep). Tone 18:45, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Solar eclipse of September 4, 2100

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This event may or not happen and 100 years is far WP:TOOSOON for an article. WP:CRYSTAL. It is likely enough that the future event is already in the chart found here List of solar eclipses in the 21st century. Lightburst (talk) 15:04, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:08, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:08, 5 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep These are extremely predictable events, see, although the predictions might be off by a few minutes. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:36, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The discussion at Articles for deletion/Solar eclipse of September 12, 2053 is also very relevant here - this is really a batch nomination that is spread across multiple AfDs. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete unless an actual significance of the solar eclipse is shown. Geschichte (talk) 21:20, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 21st century. No significance, no notability, and no sources about the solar eclipse itself. ItsPugle (please ping on reply) 03:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep This is going to happen, whether humanity and Wikipedia is around or not at the time. Oleryhlolsson (talk) 06:11, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * What? Why does this article exist? Per the others, nothing makes it stand out compared to the other solar eclipses. We do not need to list every single one of these. Delete. Foxnpichu (talk) 10:11, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - Yes, in fact, we can and we should have one article for every eclipse. Tom Ruen (talk) 16:16, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Why though? ItsPugle (please ping on reply) 01:46, 9 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment I think that this discussion is being lost about whether or not this eclipse will happen, which it almost certainly will... but that doesn't mean we need an entire article about it. It's ridiculous, there's no notability to it (you can see this in the citations - there's literally no sources, beyond automatically generated crap, that cover it), and the article's content itself is too technical for the general audience. ItsPugle (please ping on reply) 01:46, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable future event. And definite. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:01, 11 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.