Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar photonics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:31, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Solar photonics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't find notability for this topic. No WP:RS other than the primary-source first-use of this term is mentioned in the article (User:Srleffler mentioned this on its talkpage over 7 years ago and nothing has changed since). Scanning the first few pages of google hits for this term, I only saw off-topic results (name of a company). DMacks (talk) 09:27, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:02, 16 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Notability/sourcing/neologism. New term apparently used only by the group that coined it. --Srleffler (talk) 17:12, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:28, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails notability by lacking reliable sources (see WP:RS). --♫CheChe♫ talk 18:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.