Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soliciting Corporate Money

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 03:17, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)

Soliciting Corporate Money
The prose barely makes sense, and the subject (US campaign finance) is already covered properly at Federal Election Campaign Act. It seems to have been created solely to mention Tom DeLay negatively. Deus Ex 22:48, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete agreed. --Xcali 23:25, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Saying it barely makes sense is very charitable. DS1953 01:14, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: No redirect. Duplicate effort but unequal content. Geogre 02:00, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete duplicate. JamesBurns 10:17, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete--creator is vandalizing other pages incl. Federal Elections Campaign Act and Tom DeLay. Meelar (talk) 20:29, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Here's newly created similar page by the same user: New bankruptcy law. I vote delete this too. Deus Ex 23:48, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete simply presenting the truth about Tom DeLay in his own article is incriminating enough, no need for articles like this. The article also makes little sense. - Jersyko talk  14:52, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .