Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solid Earth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:03, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Solid Earth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This will never be more than a dictionary definition, and I prodded it to that effect. It does not belong on Wiktionary, however, which already has terra firma. —Swpbtalk 01:40, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  02:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge agree with above seems like a dictionary definition. It seems like this definition could be part of this article or this one  to give greater understanding to the term. It doesn't seem to merit a whole article. The article also adds in "Solid earth science" which is surely a separate topic and I'd be in favour of this part not being included. Solid earth science may be worthy of an article by itself or a disambiguation page. But that is not the topic here. Thanks. Marksterdam (talk) 09:55, 11 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Looks like more than a WP:DICDEF to me. Plus there are WP:RS. --Mr. Guye (talk) 02:51, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Someone wrote an entire book on the subject, and its studied in multiple journal entries . Spirit of Eagle (talk) 22:38, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes WP:GNG. Source examples:, , . NorthAmerica1000 22:47, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.