Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solis boxing family


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:01, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Solis boxing family

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unlikely search term and no significant independent coverage. It's not that some of the individual members aren't notable, but this topic lacks coverage on its own. The article's only sources are to the individual fight records of its members. Nothing shows the family topic is notable.Mdtemp (talk) 16:39, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 17:06, 3 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Nominator has a point - there is not enough independent coverage to justify a separate article. The information is contained in List of boxing families or the individual boxers articles.Peter Rehse (talk) 17:06, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree with the previous comments. The article has no references that refer specifically to the subject and only repeats what's already at List of boxing families. Papaursa (talk) 15:51, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.