Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solo Apple J


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. -- Longhair\talk 17:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Solo Apple J

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete unsourced drink article, fails WP:N Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete A3 (no content). Only says it's a drink and who it's made by.  So tagged. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 01:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment That's a valid stub, though it might not meet WP:N.  Jon athan  01:52, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  jonny - m  t  08:12, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SorryGuy  Talk  06:05, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, the only references to it that I can find online are various product directories and the like. WP:N.  Lankiveil (complaints 06:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  18:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:N, lack of WP:RS.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 17:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - regardless of WP:N, I'd have thought that Wiki coverage of the drink would be best done as a section in the manufacturer's article, and then can be broken out of there if need be. FlagSteward (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.