Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solomon Kinuthia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:52, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Solomon Kinuthia

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A county politician surely fails WP:NPOLITICIAN

See also Sockpuppet investigations/Kiambu1 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 22:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 22:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 22:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 22:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete — I’m afraid I don’t see how NPOL is met, I am in agreement with the nominator. Celestina007 (talk) 22:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Completely fails WP:NPOL. Except for his own self-published campaign 'manifesto' for an election at the lowest tier of local government, the provided sources contain only fleeting mentions or a name on a list, and are in no way about the subject. Incidentally, created by a user later blocked as a sock, this article also has the hallmarks of UPE or at least a very strong COI.. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have reverted the removal of the AfD banner on the page, and added the editor who removed it to Sockpuppet investigations/Kiambu1 just now Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 09:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. fails WP:NPOL — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henrycruise01 (talk • contribs) 09:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. All the sources mentioning him are the very briefest of passing mentions, stating just his name and the constituency he represents. Doesn't pass NPOL or GNG. AryKun (talk) 10:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Has no significant coverage in sources apart from personal blogs which are unreliable  Megan B....   It’s all coming to me till the end of time  08:18, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, Per nom. fails WP:NPOL. Alex-h (talk) 17:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. County government is not a level of office that confers an automatic free pass of WP:NPOL, but the substance and sourcing here are nowhere near where they would need to be to make him a special case. Bearcat (talk) 18:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, is far from our notability standards.--  Chuka Chief talk 17:08, 1 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.