Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solusi University Faculty of Science & Technology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge and redirect. Consensus is split between delete and merge. I don't see any good argument here for not merging and redirecting. I'm taking Moonriddengirl up on her offer to take care of the details of the merge and redirect. Thanks. Pigman ☿ 04:07, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Solusi University Faculty of Science & Technology

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable faculty at a university based on a lack of reliable, third-party references. No reason to believe this article will ever be notable nor any reason to merge it, as it contains no useful information.  Noetic  Sage  02:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of university deletions. &mdash; Noetic  Sage  02:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, isn't independently notable. Blast Ulna (talk) 05:19, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete nn on its own.  - Jameson L. Tai   talk  ♦  contribs  22:05, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above comments. JJL (talk) 22:23, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * transwiki to wikiversity maybe --Emesee (talk) 08:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge with Solusi University. There isn't much that isn't already there, but at least the redirect would remain for this aspect of a Zimbabwean institution article. B.Wind (talk) 04:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Solusi University. The university is notable, its faculties, no, without good evidence.  Delete the content on the departments (mere direcotry information) and the content on student organisations until sources are found.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:51, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Solusi University. There's no assertion or verification of independent notability, but the parent article is notable and this information can be easily enough incorporated without overwhelming it. Should this close as merge, I'll be happy to do the legwork on it. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:32, 12 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.