Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solutionary (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Deleted per G4, and page salted RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:23, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Solutionary
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a neutral point of view treatment of the views of secondary reliable sources. Partly a neologism, partly WP:POLEMIC, partly original research, and partly promotional. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:56, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons listed above. This is the third nomination, and the article is just as problematic as the last two times. Choard1895 (talk) 02:00, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)


 * If it's just as bad as the previously deleted article(s), let's try speedying it -- and salting. I've tagged it WP:G4. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:37, 17 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.