Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solutions for New Jersey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:43, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Solutions for New Jersey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The references provided, sparse as they are, do not indicate notability. $5,000 in revenue for 2011? No suggestion that it has had any impact anywhere?Assuming this is accurate, this is definitely not a WP:GNG organization. – S. Rich (talk) 05:44, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:57, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:57, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (comment)  @ 21:52, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:GNG. My research yields no substantial coverage in reliable sources. Safehaven86 (talk) 21:57, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: not seeing notability. Neutralitytalk 02:31, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.