Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Some Girls (Madonna song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 10:16, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Some Girls (Madonna song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS, no independent third party coverage except minor mentions in album reviews. Minor chart placement in a minor market, and no live performances either. This should be deleted or best, redirected to parent album, MDNA — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 12:38, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as there is not enough third party coverage to meet WP:GNG. Brief mentions from album reviews simply aren't enough to warrant an article.  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 13:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)


 * I really can't see a reason why this article will be deleted, because it has as many information as other songs from Rihanna, for instance, including "Do Ya Thang" and "Red Lipstick", which are considered "good articles", but they didn't have live performances as well, (and they are only available on the deluxe edition, but "Some Girls" is part of the regular edition). The information about the composition and critical reception are sufficient. And the chart performance of the songs that I've cited was very low too, so it's senseless to only give some artists the right to have articles of all of their songs (even only "deluxe edition" tracks). It's not fair! FanofPopMusic (talk) 19:28, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * WP:WAX is not a convincing argument for AFD's. Content from album reviews doesn't count as enough "information". Chart performance is irrelevant when there is no third-party coverage outside of album reviews.  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 19:33, 28 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  16:49, 3 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. What else is there to say? Op47 (talk) 22:03, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.