Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Some Mistaken Views of Economists


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   DELETE. Alexf(talk) 19:19, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Some Mistaken Views of Economists

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article is OR, unsupported by reliable sources and doesn't maintain NPOV. PROD was declined without explanation. Jimmy Pitt  talk  15:54, 22 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Total OR. The article is ABOUT an article entitled Some Mistaken Views of Economists. that may have been published in an obscure Thai journal. Definite lack of NPOV. I can't see any way this could be reworked into a stand alone encyclopedia article. --Quartermaster (talk) 16:02, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete As above this is original research and/or a paticular point of view and I personally can't see how it could be made into a proper article. Davewild (talk) 16:17, 22 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. It is an opinion that will be usefull in science. And it need to edit, but it is short time and near long Holiday. If I can lobby, I'd like to do. And if you can help, please to do so. Thank you. Rojer —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.231.176.95 (talk) 16:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - sorry but it's OR, an article about an article; the editor does not seem to have understood what Wikipedia is. Articles about written works are rare here, and their subjects are truly very notable; articles which repeat what a written work says have no place here at all. DBaK (talk) 19:33, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - if this body of the article really is just an English translation of the article as claimed at the end of the intro, then that is blatant WP:COPYVIO (I see no sign of permission.) --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:52, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Biophys (talk) 00:41, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fringe, OR. Perhaps the good judge is unfamiliar with the Hand rule. bobrayner (talk) 20:43, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. Qworty (talk) 19:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.