Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somerset Gurgle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 11:53, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Somerset Gurgle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am unable to find RS to show the notability of this topic. The one reference given doesn't have anything directly relating to the topic of the article. It was prodded soon after creation, back in 2011. &mdash; Rod talk 17:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as either a hoax or, at best, something made up this month. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 17:23, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as completely unsubstantiated with both convincing information and sources, nothing at all actually close to what would be needed for significance as a article. SwisterTwister   talk  00:04, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't think this should be deleted because I'm currently working on adding references and expanding the page, as are a couple of others. Please wait until the article has been expanded before deleting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SomeRandomUserGuy (talk • contribs) 13:45, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of scholarly sources. If this "dates back to the 17th century" I would expect to see a huge range of sources easily available. They aren't. Blythwood (talk) 14:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - this has to be a hoax. "Somerset Gurgler's Association" yields absolutely nothing; not even on Facebook, Twitter or Youtube! Even if this somehow does exist, it's certainly not a widespread tradition as it would've been mentioned somewhere. Spiderone  16:35, 30 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.