Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Something Positive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As it stands, the article seems like a lost cause. No prejudice toward re-creation if a more encyclopedic page can be created with adequate secondary sourcing. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:50, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Something Positive

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nominating on behalf of, who says: "I'm thinking this article Something Positive probably should go. I look at 'improving' it & come to the conclusion that every single part of it, judged alone, should be deleted. It doesn't seem notable, there are a few very minor possible RSs about the author, but none about the comic. Other than it having been nominated for the barely-existing WCCA, the only sources are comic pages themselves." I am neutral unless I comment below. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:40, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Cautious delete. It appears I've accidentally stumbled into yet more nonsense wiki drama, where the group that cares the most wins. As far as I can tell, from what I've read after suggesting the page be deleted, it is taken that any comic to win a WCCA thing is notable, because the WCCA is (very very dubiously) taken as notable. There's some sort of article jenga going on, all resting ultimately on a paragraph in the New York Times mentioning the WCCA. The multiple previous AFDs for the 9 (or more?) WCCA articles seem to have come up keep more as a result of lots of editors getting angry and accusing others of being biased against webcomics as a genre, than of any....thing. I don't care. I ran into the shit that is the something positive article because I was reading SP archives, and wanted to know if the quality decline of the late 2000s(decade) reversed. You decide if it's notable, I don't care....I don't hate webcomics, jeph jacques didn't eat my hamster. 92.25.131.125 (talk) 17:15, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:01, 21 August 2015 (UTC)


 * As currently written, I would be a weak delete. There's no denying that this article needs a major trim and cleanup; the cast sections are entirely too in-universe and exhaustive. The article is practically drowning in primary sources; additional WP:RS's are desperately needed otherwise I fear that boiling down the excessive sections will lead to WP:OR. $0.02  DP 76764  (Talk) 15:58, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.