Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Something to Dance For


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 14:26, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Something to Dance For

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Fails WP:NSONGS, as it has no charts, no covers by notable artists, and has won no awards. Only "source" is a blog entry labeled "gossip" in a teen mag website. Attempts to redirect it, as indicated by WP:NSONGS, have been thwarted by fans. &mdash;Kww(talk) 12:46, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, no reliable sources to prove notability.  Sumsum2010 · T · C  17:17, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment This article is also a borderline WP:CSD. It was created by a sock of Jerome0012, and it's hard to describe the contributions of the other editors as "substantial". If I hadn't already nominated the article, I would have deleted it when I blocked .&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:42, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:CSD. Don't redirect. Only substantive contributor is a banned user, very little info by others that has remained in article. Review section is based on a gossip mag. Other sections are mostly unreferenced. Article creator has habit of WP:PLAGIARISM - using free content without attribution so don't trust any of the content not backed by references - I caught one at - suspicious of more. It would be best that if the topic becomes notable the article be re-created from scratch and not use any of the existing content. And it fails WP:NSONGS.  Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:02, 11 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable song. Although editor has at least attempted to make a decent article unlike all too many tracklist and infobox efforts, but the sources are of no use.--Tuzapicabit (talk) 20:59, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.