Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Something to Dance For & TTYLXOX


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:47, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Something to Dance For &
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This is just about a mashup of two other songs which already have individual articles. I already removed background and chart info that were borrowed from those articles. There is nothing about the mashup specifically that warrants its own article that can't be merged to the song articles or its album. Title of article doesn't lend itself to an obvious redirect target. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 18:05, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 6 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete. I don't see how this particular mix could satisfy WP:MUSIC. Pburka (talk) 22:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 17:20, 20 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Details on the music video are contained in the invidivual song articles. No compelling reason to justify a separate article for this mashup, particularly with little-to-no significant coverage, chart appearances, or other factors which might indicate it meets WP:NSONGS or WP:GNG in its own right.  Gongshow  Talk 08:12, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. This mashup is already addressed in the articles for the album and each of the two constituent songs. I don't see a compelling need or sufficient critical notice of this mashup qua mashup to justify a freestanding article. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 15:51, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.