Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somnioverus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:17, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Somnioverus

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable neologism. Google doesn't turn up this word outside of this page, Gbooks doesn't have anything, Google Scholar has nothing. Mr. Vernon (talk) 17:03, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 13 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TheSpecialUser TSU 00:19, 19 August 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete (if only neologisms were covered by WP:CSD). Searched Google, Google Scholar and JSTOR: no use of the term at all. Obviously fails WP:GNG. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:03, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
 * 'Delete sometimes neologisms can be covered by the db-hoax criteria if it's blatant enough, but this seems to narrowly avoid it. Per Tom Morris 2602:306:39E1:C830:59AF:528A:3B0A:CE20 (talk) 19:02, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.