Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonatype


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 15:46, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Sonatype

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence for notability. The references,as is typical for such articles, are either mere announcements, or listings in directories.  DGG ( talk ) 04:09, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - I believe this article adheres to WG:GNG in that there is broad coverage from reliable sources. Do you have preferences on what type of articles you believe would help substantiate the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.193.187.122 (talk) 05:46, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:B2B. Also note: this article is about company, though all non-trivial coverage is about company's products. So far the company itself does not pass WP:GNG and WP:NCORP If products are notable individually, they should have their own articles, but trying to add notability of company and its products to get pass notability guidelines is just gaming the system. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 16:15, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, most of the sources provided in the article are about the products of this company, not the company itself. I'm also suspicious that a fair chunk of them read more like reprinted press releases than genuinely independent journalism.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:16, 13 July 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.