Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soneb Issi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted at the author's request. MelanieN (talk) 19:57, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Soneb Issi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A Google search for "Soneb Issi" returns no results. The article cites no sources and could be original research, or perhaps even a hoax. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:01, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * See User:Woman of Peace and User:Woman of Peace/Sonneb issi created by . Siuenti's first edit summary at Soneb Issi acknowledged the author, but a link is best per WP:CWW. Johnuniq (talk) 07:12, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:37, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:37, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, apparent hoax. Highly implausible contents; alleged image is completely unrelated and randomly taken from other context. The alleged "reference", "Rje Bla Ma Tson-kha-pa Chen Poi No Mtshar Rmad Du Byun Bai Rnam Par Thar Pa Dad Pai Jug Nogs Zes Bya Bai Bzugs So by Mkhas-grub Dge-legs-dpal-bzan-po" may create the impression of being potentially legitimate (once you look past the first impression of total gibberish), as there apparently is an author by the name of "Mkhas-grub...po", and there is a work by the title of Rie Bla ... So , but from what I can find out, author and title don't match (unless ancient Tibetan authors have name variants I don't understand, which is entirely possible), and there is no evidence why and how this ancient work would contain technical linguistic information of this sort. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:00, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * That's a real book... but I can't read it. Seemed too good to be true. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 13:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.