Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Song of Return


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:29, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Song of Return

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD, which I think should be brought here. Band has apparently only had self-published releases (two songs), and only refs are Facebook, blog, and similar - so they seem non-notable. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * delete this could be deleted due to no claim of notability, which I did one before. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:30, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete As fairly newly assembled, and having two tracks 'available for download', they don't seem to be there yet. I wish them luck - and in this business you don't just need talent, you need that break. Peridon (talk) 19:37, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:54, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.