Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Song of a Bard and Other Poems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 15:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Song_of_a_Bard_and_Other_Poems
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable, original research, weasel words, self promotion. Unrag (talk) 04:31, 18 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete The article has too many weasel words. It seems like a straight copy from the [Author's homepage]. There's too much original research, and reason to believe this is self promotion. Neither the book nor its author is notable. In any case, the article in its current form is unfit for an encyclopedia. Unrag (talk) 04:47, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Article does not indicate why its subject is important or significant (#7).

No reliable sources, no verifibility, innappropriate tone, weasel words, and clearly either original research or copy/pasting; article created and contributed to by a single person.

--Abusing (talk) 04:58, 18 August 2008 (UTC)


 * probably delete though a review is supplied. But books are not subject to speedy deletion as non notable ,so the speedy tag as been removed.
 * Delete. Can't see any speedy criterion that this meets, but it's clearly not notable. Stifle (talk) 14:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, clearly not-notable; Looks like a vanity page; Inappropriate tone for an encyclopedia. Sintihca (talk) 15:18, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:35, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per others, obviously non-notable, spam. Unrag, you don't need to prod the article while the AFD is still in progress. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 20:02, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.