Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Song of the Lord (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:30, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Song of the Lord
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete not notable and unencyclopaedic  Teapot  george Talk  20:07, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - It's more of a sermon than anything really Viet&#124;Pham (talk) 20:18, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete: no assertion of notability, no third party sourcing, most of the article appears to be WP:OR. HrafnTalkStalk 23:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete (as a practising Christian and general editor) - vague, not encyclopedic, not an established term anyway. There is nothing worth saving here. - Fayenatic (talk) 00:14, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 04:44, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 04:45, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete junk. JuJube (talk) 04:56, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Do Not Snow this until I've had a chance to try and source this. It may be as real as Glossolalia. Jclemens (talk) 05:30, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Ought to be notable as the topic has a certain significance in charismatic circles - this was at one time called Prophetic Psalmistry - see eg line 3 of Terry MacAlmon and the links here [] and especially this video []. I expected to find an article on Singing in the Spirit - but there isn't one.  Part of the problem may be that this is spontaneous worship without a tradition of written reflection; hence there will be a lack of reliable sources.  Best I can come up with is ...
 * ... Redirect to Spontaneous worship (from which this is a fork of a fork).  Springnuts (talk) 09:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep -- This is a legitimate subject, though I refer to it as "Singing in the Spirit". Currently it is a bad article, but should be rescued.  Perhaps some one can suggest a better merge target.  Perhaps it should be moved to Singing in the Spirit.  I feel sure there must be some published dicussion of the subject that could be cited and used to make a better article.  Peterkingiron (talk) 22:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Agreed that an article on Singing in the Spirit is needed - but this isn't ever going to be it, and is, I believe, best put out of its misery.  Springnuts (talk) 23:40, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: article fails to establish notability. JamesBurns (talk) 02:29, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.