Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonia Poulton (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, uncontested. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:49, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Sonia Poulton
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previous AFD was "no consensus" - Articles for deletion/Sonia Poulton. Since then there have been no positive reasons made for keeping this article - see talk page discussion - Talk:Sonia Poulton. Her credibility as a notable journalist is dubious. Anybody can call themselves a journalist. Many others with at least as much credibility don't have Wikipedia entries.--Penbat (talk) 12:11, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  12:27, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete no independent coverage of notability. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:06, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Half a dozen opinion pieces in the Daily Mail plus a few appearances as a daytime TV guest don't make this person sufficiently noteworthy to have a dedicated page, especially when far more noteworthy journalists have equal or less space dedicated to them. I'll happily list a few examples if required. I would settle for a much smaller page, but I suspect that her supporters would pad it out with waffle again to make her look more important than she is. Wikipedia is not a free marketing tool for self-promoters. --TuringBox (talk) 19:01, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.