Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonic Highways (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  03:05, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Sonic Highways (album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article of unclear notability with no reliable sources. Unencyclopedic content and a blatant WP:ADVERTISEMENT. Wikicology (talk) 21:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  21:48, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per significant coverage in reliable sources in both the article now and elsewhere. Rolling Stone, for example, is clearly a reliable source, which totally undermines the nom's claim that no such sources could be found in this article. Here are some more just in case:     Jinkinson   talk to me  21:51, 11 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep per lengthy Rolling Stone ref that was in the article before it was nommed. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:00, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep there are plenty of sources.--SportsMaster (talk) 22:10, 11 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a blog where anything goes. Been mention in one or two sources does not make a subject a wikipedia article or an encyclopedic article. I wondered how a music album that has not been released would be notable enough to be the subject of a wikipedia article. The most paramout essence of an encyclopedia is the significance of the encyclopedic subject. Wikicology (talk) 22:16, 11 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Passes WP:HAMMER, GNG. Terrible nomination. Sergecross73   msg me  22:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Upcoming album by a well known band. The significance here is clear. Additionally, the content appears to be cited. Due to this album being by a hugely popular band, this article will definitely be expanded as more information becomes available--L1A1 FAL (talk) 22:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: There's third-party sources already available for the album, with a few of them already being cited in the article. Not to mention, the track list has already been revealed. Whether or not an album has been released does not indicate notability in of itself. Kokoro20 (talk) 02:25, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.