Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonic X The Movie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy deleted as a hoax. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:37, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Sonic X The Movie

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Declined speedy/contested proposed deletion. I can't find any sources to verify this information. Possible hoax. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:00, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --Beeblebrox (talk) 22:02, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as a possible hoax. No citations, no links, only unverified claims.-- White Shadows you're breaking up 23:10, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete The believability was lost around the time they listed Megan Fox, Anne Hathaway, Nicolas Cage, etc. as voice actors for the film. Absolutely no way this would happen, unsourced, incoherent, and film studios never usually divulge their plot summaries before a film release.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:16, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Article was copied from here. Are there copyright issues? Diannaa  TALK 23:46, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Not if you look at that page's talk page (cross-posted from this article's own talk page), where someone declares to "People of the Wikipedia" that they wrote the story and want it shown to Sega so they can start filming. It's a hoax even by that wiki's standards.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:49, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note Tagged for speedy deletion as a blatant hoax. —Farix (t &#124; c) 00:00, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: no sources, no indication of existence.  Goodvac   ( talk ) 01:19, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * My bad. If i had noticed that talk page post I would have speedy deleted it right away. Although I nominated this, I don't think it would be inappropriate at this point for me to go ahead and delete it as a hoax, since it's perfectly clear now that it is one. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:35, 2 May 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.