Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonja Buholzer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus due to insufficient participation. Stifle (talk) 08:40, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Sonja Buholzer

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The comes down to a lack of WP:RS resulting in a failure to pass WP:BIO. One book and a few mentions on social bookmarking sites doesn't make a suitable entry, and hence this appears more like WP:ADVERT. Trident13 (talk) 11:34, 18 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with the tendency towards WP:ADVERT in this article - it doesn't help that all the subject's published works are not in English, thus making it harder to judge notability. Eddie.willers (talk) 13:20, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - her books exist, and she has some coverage in local news, possibly just passing WP:GNG. The "career" section is completely unreferenced as it currently stands and should be removed (refs do not contain her name) -- didn't want to do that in an ongoing AfD but tagged the faulty refs. --Pgallert (talk) 21:27, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.