Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonovista Publicidad S.A.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. If there's any parent company page to which this needs to be redirected, please do so. Currently, deleted  Wifione  Message 12:43, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Sonovista Publicidad S.A.

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lacks substantial coverage in RSs. Created by a one-article-only-ever SPA. Tagged for notability for over 1 year. Epeefleche (talk) 17:06, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete, not enough coverage available to meet notability. GNews brings a couple of articles, but the coverage is focused on the founders and on the parent company Olímpica S.A., and Sonovista Publicidad is just mentioned in passing. I can't find anything to support the claim that it is the main advertising company in the Caribbean Region of Colombia, and nothing on the P&M Magazine ranking either — Frankie (talk) 16:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * merge/redirect for now to the parent company. It is not likely that Google would find sources for an advertising agency in Columbia, so finding nothing there is not really an adequate search--but until someone does better, it'll do best merged.  DGG ( talk ) 22:21, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Non-English-speaking companies, or more to the point those who are not reflected on google sources (whatever the language), are less likely to have RS sourcing available to many of us that meets our verifiability requirements. Happily, we do have a number of Colombian companies that have articles, but over time I expect this will increase to more comprehensive levels than those that we now cover.--Epeefleche (talk) 01:06, 9 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Query. This article (as it stands) has zero text that is supported by any ref, let alone an RS ref (though it does have an EL).  Under such circumstances, is it policy to move un-referenced text (as suggested above) that does not pass our verifiability standard into another article?  Just wondering.  Tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 17:55, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The text of the article is all uncited, and challenged. Per WP:CHALLENGED, it requires inline citations.  In the absence of them, I can't see merging such text without violating our core policy of wp:v.  At the same time, I agree that it should not be as a stand-alone article.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:36, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 00:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 12:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 16:45, 25 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking substantial coverage in reliable sources. Till I Go Home (talk) 08:27, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.