Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sons of Kyuss


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Kyuss. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:09, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Sons of Kyuss

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Self-released demos are assumed non-notable per WP:MUSIC, PROD denied. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Kyuss as a plausable search-term.  Lugnuts  (talk) 10:38, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Considering that this album was an EP not a demo, and a critical early release for a highly influential and notable band deleting this article seems rather detrimential. 71.209.184.50 (talk) 07:38, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Response EPs can be demos. If this album is critical (and it may well be), that needs to be verified with sources to establish notability. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:43, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 19 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:42, 25 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Kyuss. Difficult to tell whether this is a self-released EP (i.e. released for sale) or a demo (i.e. demonstration recording aimed at getting a record deal) but either way there doesn't seem to be enough coverage of it to warrant a separate article. It's already mentioned in the Kyuss article. As a plausible search term it should be a redirect. --Michig (talk) 08:31, 25 March 2012 (UTC) It appears to be a self-released EP - if kept I would recommend calling it such rather than using the confusing metal-fan 'demo' terminology.--Michig (talk) 08:41, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Kyuss per Lugnuts and Michig. This option is reasonable as I'm unable to find significant coverage to support an individual article.  Gongshow  Talk 21:20, 31 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as failing WP:GNG, unless substantial reliable sources can be found that cover the subject in depth. Merging would require sources. If new sources are added to the article, ping my talk page and I'll take another look. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:34, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.