Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sons of Lioth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-28 13:25Z 

Sons of Lioth

 * — (View AfD)

Does not appear to pass WP:MUSIC. Google returns 66 unique hits for the band name, mostly MySpace, blogs and message boards. Unsigned. No entry on AllMusic. Article states their only release is a 5-track independent demo CD. ~Matticus TC 13:00, 15 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Marked for quick deletion only a few minutes after I posted the first version. Allow me some time to add more information.
 * Links to the publication in Mindview (monthly paper-magazine distributed in Belgium and The Netherlands). Please put deletion on hold while I gather more info.

Asplitsecond 13:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)


 * AfD is not the same as speedy deletion. There is a seven day period of discussion, and if during that time the article is edited to address the concerns of the AfD rationale (in this case, proof is added that the band meets WP:MUSIC requirements), then there is a case for keeping. ~Matticus TC 14:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails WP:BAND. Author posted separate articles for each member of the band (all now speedied). NawlinWiki 14:52, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * True, error on my part, should have read more in advance, can I delete them directly? Asplitsecond 16:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:00, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I take Asplitsecond's last edit above to mean that this may be speedyable by author request as an article "for which deletion is requested by the original author, provided the page's only substantial content was added by its author and was mistakenly created".Apslitsecond, could you confirm that either here or by placing on the article? Tonywalton  | Talk 17:34, 23 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.