Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sony Ericsson Z500a


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. --Oxymoron83 10:11, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Sony Ericsson Z500a

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable product. Few substantial references exist beyond reviews and press release announcements, so a meaningful Wikipedia article will be hard to support. Listed after prod was contested. Mikeblas 20:03, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep: This product is as notable as any. Im sure there was a million made.  the template on the bottom of the page shows a list of phones that seemed to be important enough to keep. ZyMOS 06:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Mass production doesn't confer notability. Otherwise, we'd have an article on every model and size of rivet ever manufactured; there's hundreds fold more of those than these phones, for example. -- Mikeblas 08:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notable cell phone, but as notable as the LG Voyager, but still worth keeping on Wikipedia. -- ZeWrestler  Talk 17:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - as notable as any other mobile phone. If this phone's article were to be deleted so should almost every other. --EJF 19:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Please see WP:WAX. Fact is, a number of cell phone articles have been deleted because they're not notable. If it's as notable as those other phones, then this one should be deleted, too. -- Mikeblas 08:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - I think there should be a total review of this cell-phone issue. I hope I don't offend anyone by saying so, but I have started to dislike what seems to be a salami-tactic used to delete all the cell-phones. Also, it is my conviction Wikipedia should - in general- have an article of all cell-phones with notable sources, so people comming and looking for information, will find it here. Greswik (talk) 14:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.