Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonya Noor (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:39, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Sonya Noor
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails on WP:GNG. No substantial coverage can be found where the subject has been covered in depth. WP:NOTINHERITED applies too. Previous AfD was not conclusive as the article was deleted under G5 criteria. Hitro talk 06:18, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:32, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:34, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:34, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:34, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 12:45, 30 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per not meeting WP:GNG or WP:ACADEMIC unless being a fellow of the American College of Surgeons meets WP:ACADEMIC#3. I removed a lot of unsourced information. Thsmi002 (talk) 12:53, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
 * , FACS doesn't satisfy that. I have a safe bet, that we have over a lac members/fellows. &#x222F; WBG converse 10:20, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. GS citations in this highly cited field not yet sufficient to pass WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:37, 31 May 2019 (UTC).
 * Delete surgeon withno claim to notability. the E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:11, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - sources mention subject, but are either listings or say nothing of note about the subject that establish notability. They merely establish that subject is a surgeon. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 14:45, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete There's a lack of significant coverage about her and her GS citation count is very low for her field. There are over 70,000 ACS Fellows in the U.S. and Canada so it's not a very exclusive club and insufficient to prove notability on its own. Papaursa (talk) 02:36, 5 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.