Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophia Rossi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:46, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Sophia Rossi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, industry publicity materials, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO / WP:ENT. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre; the award category is not significant. Mainstream appearances are minor. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:36, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 08:03, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 08:03, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 08:03, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Keep, performer has been covered in mainstream media by multiple reliable sources such as Norm Clarke (2006-04-26). "Clinton nearly sees rocket's red glare". Las Vegas Review-Journal, Stanton, Thomas J. "Sophia Rossi Pens Column for DVD Buzz". AVN.com. Adult Video News appeared in Bachelor Party Vegas and Penn and Teller which meets #3 on WP:PORNBIO The person has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media. She has focus on mainstream media in the last few years. Valoem talk contrib 02:50, 2 July 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as no evidence of any notability, Hasn't won any notable/significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:49, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:09, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete has not won awards that would show notability. Passing mention in minor articles does not add to passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:37, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails both GNG and PORNBIO. The reliable sources don't add up to significant coverage and the few mainstream appearances were minor. Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 21:11, 12 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.