Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophia Stewart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 01:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Sophia Stewart

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

False and libelous information is constantly added to this article in order to advance the subject's agenda and the individual is only notable for her failed lawsuit, which falls under WP:BLP1E. Jezebel's Ponyo shhh 15:37, 13 November 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:32, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep there seem to be enough sources to say it is notable. Perhaps it should be protected against changes for a year or two. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I gave a really good look at those "sources" : nothing in here above the usual internet buzz. Just the first "references" : the copyright notice is about another work altogether. The others are all but serious. I did the research because I proposed the article for deletion 3 days ago on fr.wp (discussion there for those interested - some arguments were "there is an article on en.wp"...recursivity inside). Blinking Spirit (talk) 08:39, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

Sophia Stewart won her lawsuit against the Wachowski Brothers, Joel Silver and Warner Brothers on August 11, 2009!!! http://www.facebook.com/pages/Sophia-Stewart/8212353494 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.251.110.8 (talk) 05:34, 20 November 2009 (UTC)  — 69.251.110.8 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete. Going per Blinking Spirit's argument above.  Article is a major case of WP:COATRACK - it's not about Sophia, it's about the circumstances around her lawsuits. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 01:02, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete A facebook claim is just that, a facebook claim. It has absolutely no relevance to a Wikipedia article. I could claim to have been declared the Supreme Overlord of Earth by the UN, and it would have just as much merit. DarkAudit (talk) 05:49, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The subject's apparent claim to notability is that she wrote a novel or story which, according to a lawsuit she filed, was plagiarized in both The Terminator and The Matrix franchises. However, there have been lots of cases where people have claimed that hit movies were plagiarized from their works. These lawsuits are generally not notable unless the plaintiff wins their case. There are no reliable sources that state that Sophia Stewart won her lawsuit against the filmmakers of either The Terminator or The Matrix series, and she has received relatively little media coverage in independent reliable sources over these claims. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:16, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Three edits 2009-11-20 adding bogus victory of lawsuit(s) by user Decidenow who I'm confident is Sophia herself. --Citizen P (talk) 10:45, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete As nominator...--Jezebel's Ponyo shhh 15:08, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Metropolitan90.  Pinkadelica ♣  01:20, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.