Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Hulme


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 02:25, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Sophie Hulme

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG -  Cwobeel   (talk)  18:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note that since I created this AFD, some editors have added a number of sources that may reflect notability per WP:GNG. -  Cwobeel   (talk)  22:20, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  18:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  18:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. One ref in the article which is a link to her webpage...which says "coming soon". Google doesn't bring back anything. Probably qualifies for speedy delete as blatant promotion. Szzuk (talk) 20:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak delete:- Telegraph reference is reliable however this seems to be an early stage. Its WP:TOOSOON.Ireneshih (talk) 13:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Entirely promotional in tone. . . Mean as custard (talk) 12:50, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.